Utility Week

UTILITY Week 3rd February 2017

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/780324

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 31

UTILITY WEEK | 3RD - 9TH FEBRUARY 2017 | 17 The project was awarded to contractor 4Delivery, a consortium of Veolia, Costain and MWH, and involves the demolition of much of the old 1960s plant and its replacement with a new treatment facility and odour control system. The £63 million redevelopment should be completed in 2018. If you have an asset or project you would like to see featured in this slot, please send pictures and details of the project to: paul.newton@fav-house.com or call 01342 332085. Pipe up Rod Sinden I n making the statement that brokers have no place in the water market (News, 23 January 2017, http:// bit.ly/2kizwLV), Waterscan's Neil Pendle paints a simplistic picture of a market that is influenced solely by the retailer and motivated by margin. He has completely ignored that fact that consumer behaviour will be a critical component in how this market will evolve. The customer will decide whether third-party intermediaries (TPIs) have a role in the marketplace. The point is made that the margins are small, but this could be seen as a cautious approach adopted by Ofwat as a means of controlling the growth of an emerging market. Because the savings are limited and successful businesses are busy businesses, knowledgeable and trusted TPIs will be needed. It is a logical step for the customer who uses a TPI for their gas and electricity purchasing to require it to deal with their water purchas- ing as well. So, whether TPIs wish to enter the market or not, their customers will dictate that they do so by requiring a comprehensive offering. Reducing the cost of water is not the only way of saving money. Water efficiency, bill scrutiny and time- saving measures such as single billing for multi-site premises will be a feature of the new market, and all have a role to play. Members of the Utilities Intermediaries Association (UIA) have been advising on these methods for years in the non-competitive water market. The UIA would agree that certain types of brokers should not be welcome in any industry, namely those that seek to confusticate the customer to make a quick buck. All members of the UIA work to a proven code of practice tied to an independent redress scheme, so a customer can use a UIA member's services with complete confidence. Ofwat, like the gas and electricity regulator Ofgem, has no governance over TPIs and will be introducing only a voluntary code of practice. Many TPIs will claim they work to this, but if anything goes wrong it has no teeth. If Ofwat wishes to keep the market clean it should insist that retailers make their TPIs record all calls asso- ciated with a verbal introduction in their entirety, and make recordings available should there be a complaint. How will you decide which TPIs to use for your utility purchases? A UIA member who has signed a binding agreement to work in your best interests or someone who says they will honour a voluntary code of practice that offers you no additional redress should you be treated unfairly? Rod Sinden, operations director, Utilities Intermediaries Association "Contrary to suggestions otherwise, there is a place for third-party intermediaries in the retail water market." Operations & Assets Members of the UIA work to a code of practice tied to an independent redress scheme

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UTILITY Week 3rd February 2017