Utility Week

UTILITY Week 9th December 2017

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/760248

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 7 of 31

8 | 9TH - 15TH DECEMBER 2016 | UTILITY WEEK Interview for the sector from blossoming into belief. Neill highlights a poll that took place at the Energy UK annual conference, in which the audience – made up of indus- try representatives – was asked who they thought would benefit most from the CMA's remedies. Neill said she was shocked to discover that 45 per cent of the audience stated that active switchers would benefit most from the CMA's remedies, whereas only 11 per cent thought non-switching customers on SVTs would benefit the most. "Having the very people responsible for engaging the market not thinking that it is going to happen or going to make a difference is very worrying," she says. According to Neill, a major area that indicates the lack of interest on the part of energy retailers with engag- ing their customers, and of the lack of competitive forces in the sector, is around customer service and in particu- lar, billing. The high-profile billing problems the major suppliers have had in recent years, from British Gas, through to Npower and Scottish Power, come partly from hav- ing fragmented legacy systems dating back to the time before privatisation. But smaller newer suppliers have also had billing issues. "There are always going to be IT problems, but in the energy sector it shows lack of pressure on them to sort it out before it gets to disaster stakes. If another organisa- tion wasn't able to send you a bill, it would be a priority to get that fixed. In energy, it shows that is not where the priority is." Neill argues, as a consumer watchdog would, that customer service needs to improve, as does the com- petitiveness of the market. This is all the more urgent because the new government has been making sounds that it is eager to intervene in the market. Neill understands the sentiment from prime minister Theresa May, but goes against the usual tone of Which? and urges caution, saying the suppliers, the regulator and the market need time to try to improve the situation themselves. "The top actors, all the way up to Theresa May, are seemingly very keen to have some sort of intervention. So far, these seem to be either things people said in the past were not a good idea or go against what the CMA said. "We're in an odd position to be saying we are not sure government intervention at this point is a good idea. There needs to have been time for them to do it themselves." The Which? executive director thinks the govern- ment's noises about intervention could all just be a way for politicians to keep the pressure on the sector to make the essential changes to improve things for customers. She is full of praise for the business and energy sec- retary Greg Clark, calling him a "thoughtful person", and states that government rhetoric could just be "grandstanding". Yet she warns the sector that the threats should not be taken lightly. "If in five years' time we find ourselves saying the same old things, we will probably be in a different world with price regulation." One of the biggest drivers of change is expected to be the rollout of smart meters across the domestic energy market in the UK. Two-thirds of the Data Communica- tions Company (DCC) networks are now up and running aer repeated delays, although the northern region is not live yet. Neill's main concern is not that the programme itself could fail to meet its targets because of the DCC delays. Instead, she wor- ries about much wider impacts. "I think it ultimately threatens the success of the CMA [remedies]. People have missed this," she warns. "The CMA puts a lot of its hopes of improved competi- tion in the market on the fact that everyone has a smart meter and smart technology, which pushes innovation. All of that stuff feels so far away at the moment." On top of that, the early smart meter rollout is now beginning to see its first wave of complaints coming in, as the early adopters come up against unexpected problems. Primarily this revolves around switching. Neill says Which? is receiving calls from smart meter customers who are having trouble switching supplier, or have been told they need to pay to replace their smart meter so they are able to switch and retain the smart functionality. Switching brings the conversation to another area in which the CMA is keen to see change: price comparison websites (PCWs). The CMA called for the removal of the whole of market requirement for PCWs, reinstating their ability to negotiate exclusive deals with suppliers. Neill, who acknowledges Which?'s own comparison site offering, says this is another one of those remedies that will come down to the execution. "The thought with it is, if you get some big PCW to negotiate special deals, you may see some downward pressure that doesn't exist at the moment. The down- side would be from a consumer perspective that you may have to visit more than one website to get the best deal." She also states that PCWs do not currently show the entire market, sometimes due to the way results are presented, whereby commission-paying deals are posi- tioned higher. But, more importantly, Neill notes that collective switching offers are not included. Removing the whole of market requirement from PCWs "makes it very clear" they are not showing you the entire market. However, out of all the CMA remedies, Neill states this will be one of the last to come forward, because of its controversial nature, and the need for other more press- ing remedies and action to be completed first. She views the energy sector in the wake of the CMA investigation and the new government as a work in progress – much like Which?'s own offices. The plans have been set out to make the sector more competitive and fairer for consumers, and Neill is now keen for these to be followed through, not only to the letter, but also in terms of the spirit of the remedies. Failure to do so, or changing the plans part-way through the restoration process, could lead to flaws, although not as serious as if the suppliers do not take them on board and embrace them. Rounding off the interview, Neill says her message to the sector is to engage with customers, find innovative ways to keep existing customers and deal fairly to win new ones. "Do not rely on the regulator or government to tell you to do something," she states. Grabbing a coffee from the stall outside our meeting room, she concludes by reiterating the risk suppliers run by failing to change their ways – the return of price regulation. "Having the very people responsible for engaging the market not thinking that it is going to happen or going to make a difference is very worrying"

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UTILITY Week 9th December 2017