Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government
Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/315090
20 | 23rd - 29Th MaY 2014 | UTILITY WEEK Finance & Investment Analysis T he big six energy companies, and espe- cially UK-based Centrica and SSE, are currently taking a lot of political flak. It is a scenario that seems unlikely to change as the general election approaches in a year's time. Given their large retail base, both compa- nies are vulnerable as politicians, especially Labour leader Ed Miliband, take aim at the unpopular utilities. Undoubtedly, the prom- ise of cheaper energy bills from an elected Labour government will ring true to many disillusioned voters. Utilities are now replacing bankers as public enemy number one. Since the 2008 financial crisis, banks, such as the hapless RBS, have been hammered in the court of public opinion. Worryingly for investors, utility share prices are now being adversely affected, most notably that of Centrica, which has just announced a profit warning due to mild weather in the UK and some dreadful weather in the US. Importantly, too, it has put up for sale three gas-fired power stations. Its recent gen- eration returns from these plants were pro- foundly disappointing. However, it is Miliband's pledge to freeze energy prices for the first 18 months of a Labour government that has depressed Cen- trica's share price as analysts slash profit forecasts on the basis of reduced margins. This analysis is being replicated throughout the food retail sector. While SSE is also vulnerable, it has sub- stantial generation earnings. However, it also faces September's independence referen- dum, which raises very different issues, most of which are unprecedented, although the establishment of the Irish Free State in 1922 provides a precedent of a sort. Undoubtedly, recent political intervention is closely related to the fact that utility cus- tomers are also voters. Given this apparent curse of retail exposure, it begs the question as to whether Centrica and others should reduce their retail activities, or indeed exit the market completely. In the latter scenario, complex legal issues would no doubt arise. Discerning investors will have noticed how National Grid – without a retail base – has escaped virtually all political criti- cism. Its share price performance has been impressively robust, especially with its UK regulated revenues effectively locked in until 2021. Outside the energy utilities, the oil sector provides probably the closest analogy to the branding issues currently affecting retail- facing utilities. Shell's activities rarely become high pro- file, unless petrol prices are involved. In fact, Shell makes minimal profit from petrol fore- court sales, perhaps 2p per litre. Similar com- ments apply to BP, or at least did prior to the disastrous blow-out in the Gulf of Mexico. If both companies sold or closed all their petrol stations, would their finances and share price suffer significantly? For UK utilities, this issue most affects Centrica. Back in 1997, when the then Brit- ish Gas was split up, Centrica was allocated the retail customer base – and, crucially, the legal right to use the British Gas name in the UK. Given the deep-seated safety concerns of millions of gas users, this name undoubtedly conveys a potent symbol of trust, which is heavily endorsed on television. To bolster its balance sheet, the comp- nay also got both major Morecambe Bay gas fields. Today, the branding benefits of being British Gas are being progressively eroded by aggressive hard-nosed politics. Of course, Centrica could seek to change the British Gas name, but given its embed- ded technical reputation, this is unlikely to work. Recent name changes, such as Consig- nia for Royal Mail, did the latter few favours. On the financial front, Centrica's profit margins will come under real scrutiny if a Labour government is elected, and an eight- een-month price freeze could be extremely damaging, especially if gas input prices, for whatever reason, were to rise. Aside from Norway and the US, where Centrica has signed up to long-term con- tracts, the largest overseas gas suppliers are the Middle East, North Africa and Rus- sia, none of which are known for political stability. Interestingly, though, Drax Power pro- vides a template of sorts as a generator oper- ating purely on a B2B basis. Drax itself has not escaped political controversy of late due to its questionable – and very expensive – biomass conversion policy. In any event, having recently confirmed that three of its gas-fired stations are up for sale, Centrica does not seem disposed to rely on improved UK generation returns. In its 2013 full-year figures, Centrica con- firmed an underlying operating profit of almost £2.7 billion, of which £571 million – 21 per cent – was attributable to its UK residential energy operations. But its highly rated energy business, despite a £133 mil- lion loss on gas-fired generation, contributed over £1.3 billion. On its own, this latter divi- sion would presumably attract an enhanced price/earnings rating. Nonetheless, Centrica still needs the cashflow from its UK retail operations. How- ever, this does not mean that the status quo will necessarily endure, especially if margins are slashed following the general election. Moreover, Centrica is expected to lose market share, either voluntarily or compulso- rily, depending on the Competition and Mar- ket Authority's (CMA) conclusions. It could pre-empt these likely recommendations by selling parts of its UK retail operations. The curse of energy retail Energy retail margins are tiny, but being in retail makes the big six fair game for angry politicians. Might the big energy companies be better off simply exiting the retail sector? Nigel Hawkins reports. national Grid share priCe, 2014 860p 840p 820p 800p 780p Jan Feb Mar Apr May