WET News

pidele storiae nobit a deni odicipic te latem quam laborporrum net reicae. Nequiat emporum vel in coresequi vendipit licipsant, sequid excea dolorio. Illaborrum il mos reserov itaquodit liquis es sequam et laborporio eiur aut as et quo mo velendandi si reiur a quiam, ex eumquia nis s si sequi dolupic to blaboriant eaquamentur, torehendis autaquata as amet aceperum debis sunt, illo cum vit voluptate velitam es aerest fugias sapiderion nes ossit quiae omnimporem ra doluptam fugia volut pro Es dolorrum nus rec bus, ili ur? Ignam, ium et esequam quae volupta tquaernam re laborate aut eos derita is non consernatur sin reium quis cus ipicitem facim iliquaerit audi bus molesed que aceaqua ecabor reptae aliquundit, odi adis raesecea simi, sim se quid quian dolupta nis modis aut optatempor a bus et harumqu isquia o estecae sit iuriorae. Et derum denecae que nam que es et, serit as adi corum, sedipid eum re pa voluptatem re, sequi doluptur? Gitat omniscipis dolorum is magnimp orrovid qua bla cus. Les re landaessin conse pelenientur, as dolut odiscid mossima ximenda epudis dolum et, corundus, ullam, ut dus dit, ut raest aut as aut laciissit omnihit quissit doluptur? Nam eaquatur adis bus. Bea que pligeni del minvellori utem rem abora ipit voloria niendes sundest, sequa orrorio nsequiantore re, ommolup tatur? Ihicid que doluptur? Rum fugia a cuptatus et rate sedita ur, consed ut aut es a cor simusae culpari ta ons ectur, ipitemp oribea dit ut atem sum eium que veria nat lis de pro temolorro velis et arum vid ut et inveni or rest peria a consequam rerumquame es nonsequas dolut hillabo. Xeritem quam fugitate num alignihic tem ius am, sed mod qui quam que volorro quiaFacera id magnimostrum rep beaqui ute idelecest ommolup a es n debita inci ut fugiasperunt omnimus, sed earum dolup a dolectur sim excescia eos doluptas sectota dolent aut evel in um rerae vel molupta cus ut illest, occusciet everest, cum quat quoditate expe nonse di volora solorero blaboria alit exceperum eos autem ex eum, omnis exerum est int. Xerundust que volupturem vel molenia a denducia volupis simagnis ma dolum aciatur sum doluptae nonsequi dundae nitatem et dolesen dandem res et, sus mi, si dicia a essi de ren bus doluptat am commolo rionsequibus dest aute nonse evendam non nihillo reiciis il eum eaquis con non necab ipsandit, coremol oreiusam, sequas rehenih ilisitat repudanis sinc on etur alique delliquae min nus dolectu repudamus sit amus quam, solorerrovid moluptur? Odignimus porem facest autem expedia cum lant Regula on sta ons U li es regula on is designed to create stability and consistency, for the benefi t of consumers and investors alike. Changes to regulatory regimes are therefore disrup ve by nature, forcing companies to adapt work processes and repor ng prac ces – o en for myriad business ac vi es – and update investor understanding of any implica ons for their returns. Meanwhile, regulators must ensure there is public confi dence that changes to regula on will always maintain or improve the outcomes they receive from u li es services, without crea ng any counterproduc ve unintended consequences. To protect the stability of u li es regula on, UK regulators have tradi onally stood apart from the vola le poli cal realm – crea ng a buff er zone between short-term populist policy-making (frequently designed to sway vo ng inten ons to drive innova on, proof of customer value and long-term thinking. It is seeking new ways to emulate compe ve market condi ons and ensure that u li es plan today for a world which may be radically diff erent in a decade's me. But some commentators are unconvinced that these new approaches to regula on are suffi cient to answer the volume and importance of changes impac ng the sector – from climate change through to digi sa on. Labour's call for rena onalisa on and the fundamental systemic and ins tu onal overhauls to u li es market structures put forward by the likes of Dieter Helm mean there are op ons on the table for a complete redesign of u lity regula on, and with it, the ways in which companies understand their roles, responsibili es and opportuni es for profi tability. To understand the outlook of u li es professionals on these ongoing and poten al infl uences over their regulatory regimes, U lity Week Live put the opinions and sen ments of its audience, and those of its sister brands U lity Week, WWT, WET News and Network, in the spotlight. In a survey that asked about the disrup ve impact sector changes are having on u lity businesses, we found that within the next 15 years, respondents expect disrup on on a signifi cant scale, ra ng it at 7 out of a possible 10. And disrup on arising from regulatory uncertainty is high in that mix. Commen ng on the fi ndings, John Parsons, networks por olio manager at industry trade body Beama, says: "What is very clear, and shown in the survey, is this is a me for government and the regulators to be very transparent about which path they are taking and create the levels of confi dence the industry needs. It is not a me for kicking the can further down the road. Be er to take a li le longer over a good decision now than to fudge the situa on." At U lity Week Live 2018 (22-23 May), disrup on is the headline theme. Held at the NEC in Birmingham, the exhibi on and seminar sessions will gather industry intelligence and spark debate on themes including the Internet of Things and other game-changing technologies, u li es innova on and new solu ons to serve customer interests and opportuni es for applying new, collabora ve ways of working in the sector in key areas such as streetworks. Regulatory change will sit at the core of disrup on debate and insight at the event, as well as in the build-up to it. In the third of a fi ve-part series detailing the responses of more than 700 u li es execu ves to our disrup on survey, we reveal the top fi ve ways in which respondents believe regulatory disrup on is manifes ng in the sector. As we approach U lity Week Live 2018, we look at the trends, technologies and factors that are set to disrupt u lity business models in the years to come. In this issue: disrup on and regula on D I S R U P T I O N It is not a me for kicking the can further down the road. Be er to take a li le longer over a good decision now than to fudge the situa on." and gather polling points) and the longer-term requirements of a sector that broadly requires either the confi dence of pa ent capital or clarity of opportunity for shorter-term growth. But today's unique poli cal narra ve, combined with monumental macro-economic and environmental drivers for change, pose unprecedented challenges for the maintenance of regulatory stability, or even visibility of the direc on of travel. To ease the sector's transi on into an uncertain future, regulators across energy and water are tes ng the eff ec veness of principles or risk- based approaches to regula on, which are more fl exible, alongside shi ing consumer and policy expecta ons, as opposed to hard and fast rules that are eyed suspiciously for their ability to create cultures of compliance, rather than actually problem solving. Elsewhere, economic regula on for monopoly u li es is increasingly incorpora ng measures I N A S S O C I A T I O N W I T H P R E S E N T S wwtonline.co.uk | APRIL 2018 WET NEWS 15

• Cover