Utility Week

Utility Week 3rd November 20017

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/895369

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 24 of 31

UTILITY WEEK | 3RD - 9TH NOVEMBER 2017 | 25 Operations & Assets Market view I t's a busy time for re-invention. From car companies and oil refiners wonder- ing about life aer 2040, to our nuclear industry scratching its head about Brexit and withdrawal from Euratom in 2019, life is changing fast and in unimagined way. Less headline-grabbing, but just as sig- nificant, is what's going on with the water industry. The stalwarts of the utility sector are under irresistible pressure to change. By 2030, they could be substantially different to now. But what direction are they heading in – environmental guardian, energy company, wholesaler, retailer? What they turn into will ultimately define the relationship with their customers. Change takes time, and so up and down the country in water company boardrooms bets are being made on what the future holds and what direction to take the company in. In a sector where you may have combined operations that manage whole- sale water, wastewater and retail operations, the fundamental question is: "Should water companies just be wholesalers and leave the rest to others?" For outsiders looking in, this has the makings of a mid-life identity crisis for the water industry. It is very hard to formulate a concrete strategy that deals with uncer- tainty and there's a lot of that about right now. Central government is distracted by Brexit, and what direction and leadership it is able to provide for the next couple of years is open to debate. Potential future regulatory changes from Ofwat are similarly uncertain. Some expect AMP7 (2020-25) to deliver retail separation and consequently some water companies are already organised for separa- tion, whereas others are thinking the govern- ment will have its hands full and this idea will be pushed into the long grass. There is no escaping the macro economic environment either. Everyone is having to do more with less because of the limits on eco- nomic growth. Money is going to be tighter for both investment within water companies and coming in from customers as Brexit impacts on the wider economy (despite what the politicians may promise us). We also need to have much more resilient assets, the pipes and sites need to cope better and recover faster from more severe weather and more storms. It is Mother Nature's exquisitely timed echo to the man-made uncertainties we have created for ourselves. There's a sim- ple message here: circumstances are difficult and will remain so. The core service provi- sion will have to remain but under sharply different economic and social conditions. Not just an economic matter, but also social and environmental. As well as less money, we will also have to use less energy and chemicals and use them better. It is worth considering what effect this is having on investors in the sector. Last year, Australia's Sovereign Wealth Fund sold its stake in Southern Water to Hermes, and Macquarie divested its 26 per cent stake in Thames Water to Borealis. More recently, Prudential sold its 10 per cent stake in York- shire Water with fellow shareholders Corsair Capital and Deutsche Bank (together 50 per cent owners) rumoured to be following suit. There is an existential question here. Does it make sense to have so many water companies? In the current climate it makes more sense to rationalise and have some- thing like ten water and wastewater compa- nies operating nationally. Interestingly, the economics of how to value a water company remain in their favour. As companies build new infrastructure it is valued as an asset. The returns will still be there. More people will need more water. More houses will need more connections to the grid and so on. What will remain true in 2030 and beyond is the extent to which water companies par- ticularly are embedded within the local com- munity. Traditionally UK water suppliers have had a good relationship with their cus- tomers, playing an active part in communi- ties, charities and the local environment. It is the source of life aer all. In Britain our water companies are viewed as world class, with Veolia and Severn Trent two contenders to be the very best globally. If we are to be (some would argue "remain") the envy of the world in terms of water management we have some lessons to take on board. By 2030 there will be nowhere to hide in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Our water companies need to be lean, innovative, open minded and have a customer-back focus, treating water as a pre- cious resource and educating consumers on water preservation. In a nutshell, water companies need to be change-able, because you just don't know what's coming around the corner. Our vision of what the end of AMP8 in 2030 might be now will have changed in five years' time and again in the five years aer that. Strat- egy, like the water that courses through the network, needs to be fluid. This sort of con- tinuous transformation mindset is difficult to grasp for an industry that buries things in the ground for 100 years, but it can be done. Utility companies have learned about lean process improvement. They have adopted change practitioners. They now have to adapt these learnings to the core and not just the periphery. The biggest character trait of our water company of 2030 will be its ability to constantly evolve, making change as regular as the seasons. James Clement, Egremont Group The water company of 2030 With Brexit and a changing regulatory environment, it's impossible to predict what the future holds – so water companies must learn to embrace change as a matter of course, says James Clement. Key points Water companies could be asked to focus on a number of areas in the future: envi- ronment, energy, wholesale, and retail. Central government leadership is wanting in the run-up to Brexit. AMP7 could see the implementation of retail separation. Brexit will almost certainly mean a squeeze on investment and consumer spending power. Severe weather events are increasing in number and seriousness. There is a logical rationale to reduce the number of water companies. Water companies need to be change-able.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - Utility Week 3rd November 20017