Utility Week

UTILITY Week 18th November 2016

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/751482

Contents of this Issue


Page 19 of 31

20 | 18TH - 24TH NOVEMBER 2016 | UTILITY WEEK Finance & Investment Market view I mports from the Continent have long been a staple of UK energy supply, but over the past few weeks there has been a dramatic shi in energy flow across the French interconnector. In October, exports ran at an average 0.2GW per day, compared with 1.3GW in the same month last year. In total, October saw 19 days of net energy export compared with a previous maximum of two days since 2014. Given relatively low capacity margins, this raises questions about whether our depend- ence on the interconnector is a threat, par- ticularly with Brexit imminent. Conversely, could the prospect of energy exports to the Continent provide a potential market? The primary cause of the change is out- ages in the French nuclear fleet. In June, the French Nuclear Safety Authority raised potential safety issues at 13 reactors, which were subsequently closed for repairs. This shut off 13GW of capacity, accounting for 12 per cent of France's total. Further shut- downs have been required and despite some returns, 11 per cent of total installed French electricity capacity is still offline. In terms of price, the change in flows has resulted in a significant rise in GB mar- ket prices. On 24 and 25 October, day ahead prices were above £70/MWh. This is the first time there have been consecutive days above £70/MWh since March 2013. Hourly prices also saw a level of volatility far greater than in recent years. Since 1 September, hourly prices exceeded £180/MWh on 17 occasions, whereas in the previous year that level was reached only twice. As we go into the winter, it looks likely that market prices will be quite unlike those seen in recent times. In terms of capacity, National Grid's Win- ter Outlook projects a capacity margin of 6.6 per cent. However, this assumes 2.5GW imports and includes 3.5GW of supplemen- tal balancing reserve (SBR). If we cannot rely on the imports from France, then the margin without the SBR is -3.1 per cent. The impact of tight margins has already been seen in that National Grid issued its first ever "capacity market notice" on 31 October, less than one month aer the commencement of the electricity capacity market. The SBR in turn could have an effect on price. There is some ambiguity around market rules, but in theory if the SBR is used, the imbalance price will be set at £3,000/MWh. This price ceiling could well filter into day ahead pricing as participants aim to avoid substantive imbal- ance cost during hours of supply shortage. It is possible that this will prove to have been a one-off incident. However, the out- ages do highlight the challenge France faces from its mature facilities and delays with new-build. This then raises the question of what will happen aer Brexit if we see simi- lar shortages. If the UK does not remain part of the integrated energy market, it is not clear what the supply priorities would be and whether the UK could depend on elec- tricity through the interconnector. Alongside these potential threats to sup- ply are possible opportunities. Is there an opportunity for UK generation? Do these issues, aligned to a low value of sterling, pro- vide export opportunities? For the owners of generation, the recent high market prices and volatility represent an opportunity for highly profitable genera- tion. Baseload plant is able to command a significant profit and peaking plants, which are not usually required to generate, have been called into action. Relatively stable prices in recent years, with few high priced periods, has led to a degree of pessimism among investors regard- ing the profitability of wholesale generation. While the recent market prices are due to a temporary series of events, they do demon- strate the vulnerability of the GB market and the opportunity for wholesale generators. In terms of exports, much has been made generally of the potential benefits of the fall in the value of sterling. Could this, aligned to continental issues, generate more substan- tive energy export opportunities? For energy it is not that simple. This is a classic Brexit issue that although our exports are theo- retically aided by a weak pound, the import commodity costs may nullify this benefit. The Purchasing Manager's Index this month reported that import price rises are "leading to one of the steepest rises in pur- chasing costs in the near 25-year survey his- tory". This also applies to energy. The power we export may come predominantly from coal or gas – both are primarily priced in dol- lars. With the decline of the North Sea, we are now a net gas importer and need to buy in dollars. These fuels are also subject to the carbon price under the EU Emissions Trad- ing System, priced in euros, so again the raw input cost is increased by a weaker pound. In addition, the UK's historically low capacity margin means prices are typically higher than those in the EU. This situation could be further exacerbated if the UK ends up outside the IEM and tariffs are applied to power exports. It is a complex picture, but the French outages provide an interesting case for what the threats and opportunities of our inter- connected power network may be in a post- Brexit world. Ted Hopcro and Duncan Steen, energy experts, PA Consulting The French connection Is the France interconnector a threat or an opportunity for the GB energy market – and is this affected by Brexit and a falling pound? Ted Hopcroft and Duncan Steen examine the issues. GB TO CONTINENT INTERCONNECTOR FLOWS, WEEKLY AVERAGE (MW) Source: PA Consulting 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 -500 -1,000 -1,500 -2,000 01/01/2015 01/04/2015 01/07/2015 01/10/2015 01/01/2016 01/04/2016 01/07/2016 01/10/2016 France Netherlands

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UTILITY Week 18th November 2016