WET News

Alliances 2016

Water and Effluent Treatment Magazine

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/593880

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 4 of 31

ALLIANCES 2016 5 So what are the consequences when something goes wrong with the partner- ships, and what can consortia do to pre- vent major impact? One legal company says it is rare for alliances to see a partner leave early. However, its advice would be for all the partners to pre-agree the terms of depar- ture to maintain control in the event that it should happen. Issues that also needed to be considered are the transfer of undertaking regulations (TUPE) where staff are concerned and, importantly, EU procurement rules regarding transition arrangements. Final act Unfortunately, the industry will lose 4Delivery (Costain, MWH and Veolia) and Optimise (J Murphy, Clancy Docwra, Barhale and MWH). In the final year of its AMP5 contract with Thames Water, Opti- mise has been responsible for delivering £122M of Value of Work Done for Thames Water's Capital Programme. It is still working on several clean and waste network projects in north London and the Thames Valley. As the work is completed, the joint ventures teams will revert where possible to partner company operations, some of which are involved with Thames Water's AMP6 programme. 4Delivery's final act for Southern Water is delivering the £63M Woolston WwTW Redevelopment Scheme. All in all, it's been a busy time not just in tendering for AMP6 frameworks but getting to know new alliance partners. In with the new, out with the old. AMP6 has seen a number of new alliances start up leaving some older organisations to close-out existing projects

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of WET News - Alliances 2016