Utility Week

UTILITY Week 17th July 2015

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/541481

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 24 of 31

UTILITY WEEK | 17TH - 23RD JULY 2015 | 25 Operations & Assets Market view T he structure of the future non- household water retail market in England is becoming clearer. Ofwat and Open Water are providing ever more information on the requirements for market opening in 2017; water companies and new entrants across the UK are rapidly defining their approach to competition. For many, a nationwide competitive water retail market is an attractive proposition, with a potential market size of around £2 billion. Agile retailers are already scouring the country for the most profitable customers to target, while at the same time multi-site organisations are evaluating the benefits of consolidating their service with one single provider. A consistent nationwide service is expected by customers and great change will be required for water companies in order to provide this. But for many, the expansion of retail com- petition brings a major dilemma. Many com- panies are keen to be an active player in the market, but recognise that this would require significant investment, with no guarantee of success in a highly competitive market. How can companies address this conundrum? One strategy currently being evaluated by many water companies and new entrants is "white labelling". This is common across many industries and involves outsourcing many elements of a process to an organisa- tion with greater operational capabilities, while using the brand to attract and retain customers. At its most extreme, the entire function can be outsourced and just the brand name used, but there are intermediate steps whereby, for example, the direct cus- tomer interaction could be retained. If we consider the strategic options avail- able, it is clear to see why many water retail- ers are currently considering a white label approach to the new water market. Firstly, to expand operations and compete nationwide poses many problems for retail- ers in their current form. Historically, water companies have operated in their allocated region and have required limited investments to retain and attract new customers. While this approach provides commercial oppor- tunities such as cross-selling of services, achieving this state of maturity on a nation- wide basis will require significant investment in infrastructure, people and processes. This tactic provides no guarantees of profitability and customers will vote with their feet if ser- vice levels are not consistently high enough or if they are provided with more attractive offers. As companies lose customers, their fixed costs will erode the margins and could drive them into loss. For water companies with less appetite for risk, retail exit may be enticing. Although not yet fully defined, this would likely result in all legal duties relating to the provision of retail services to non-household customers being removed and transferred to another licen- see. This provides a get-out clause to water companies without the appetite to invest in the infrastructure required to keep up with a market that is likely to develop rapidly. Exiting the market will provide clearer focus on core business operations, freeing up valuable resources required for the delivery of AMP6. For organisations looking to find a mid- dle ground between investing in full com- petition, and the point of no return posed by market exit, white labelling may provide a low-risk option. Through effective contrac- tual negotiation, incumbent retailers can retain rights to cross-selling of related prod- ucts, or even open up entirely new revenue streams by taking advantage of their delivery partner's existing capabilities. White labelling has been successful in a wide range of sectors with customers oen unaware that their product or service is a rebrand of that provided by a different com- pany. For example in financial services, Post Office Money sells products provided by Clydesdale Bank. In telecoms, Tesco uses the O2 network and in broadband, John Lewis repackages the Plusnet service. Brand recall in the energy sector has seen both M&S Energy and Ebico beat SSE in the 2015 Which? Switch energy satisfaction sur- vey, despite being white label products. In fact, the practice is already being used suc- cessfully by many regulated water compa- nies to sell water efficiency products online through Save Water Save Money. However, recent comments made by First Utility to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) have focused the spotlight on white labelling. First Utility asserted that large suppliers "may be using their white labels as a tool to simply switch on and off aggressive acquisition tariffs, whilst leaving disengaged consumers of the licence holder on a high-priced standard tariff ". The energy market is very different from the fledgling water non-household market and Ofwat will have the benefit of guidance from the CMA conclusions on the issue – however, this does indicate that white labelling should not be considered an entirely risk-free approach. It is clear that white labelling of water ser- vices presents an opportunity to incumbent suppliers that should not be overlooked. As April 2017 creeps ever closer, water compa- nies will have to decide for themselves the scale of their respective investments and their approach to a competitive water mar- ket. If the rest of the utilities industry is any- thing to go by, white label water will have a place in that market sooner rather than later. Rahul Gupta, managing consultant, PA Consulting Group White label way for water? Many companies are keen to be active in the opening of the water retail market, but have an investment dilemma. Rahul Gupta asks if white labelling could offer them a commercially viable option. Key points A nationwide competitive water retail market is an attractive proposition, with a potential market size of around £2 billion. Many companies are keen to be an active player in the market, but recognise that this would require significant investment, with no guarantee of success. For organisations looking to find a middle ground between investing in full competi- tion, and the point of no return posed by market exit, white labelling may provide a low-risk option. Incumbent retailers can retain rights to cross-selling of related products.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UTILITY Week 17th July 2015