Utility Week

UW December HR single pages

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/1485723

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 13 of 43

14 | DECEMBER 2022 | UTILITY WEEK Pan-utility Event be fixed but we need to be comprehensive and we need to be absolutely crystal clear what's going to happen next." Marzia Zafar, deputy director of strategy and decar- bonisation at Ofgem, insisted in a subsequent panel ses- sion on regulation that the energy watchdog's upcoming retail market review would continue to encourage inno- vation in suppliers. She said: "We are not discouraging competition and innovation: those are the basis of the energy market going forward. "We want to have a healthy supplier market, whether that's six, eight, 20 or 30 suppliers." Cox: Could water licences be under threat? The former chair of Ofwat warned of a potential "per- verse" and "irrational" outcome for water companies that fail to restore public legitimacy by suggesting politi- cal reaction to consumer anger could threaten company licences. Jonson Cox said the tensions relating to the sec- tor ranged from "annoyance" at restrictions during the drought to outrage at pollution in rivers. Cox said the sewage issue meant the industry's reputation was "trashed" in the eyes of billpayers even if not all compa- nies were at fault. "When customers get angry, and that is felt by parliamentarians, that is when irrational things have happened before now," he added. He set out the trilemma for water as: affordability and customers; investment and resilience; and environment, but maintaining customer support was the key to the three elements. The water sector in England and Wales, as well as the energy sector in Great Britain, "have or are at risk of " losing customer legitimacy, he said. "Both need to rethink rapidly and rethink their propo- sitions for customers, Cox said. "In my experience, loss of customer support can lead to irrational, poor deci- sions being made on the hoof." "I can't see nationalisation coming back on the agenda, but I do see threats to companies that don't win customer legitimacy. The threat I would worry about is the 25-year rule to remove a licence. That's not exactly a strong tool for a regulator to have a 25-year notice period to remove a licence." Cox said over the summer, with the anger that has surrounded the sector, he had observed political reaction carefully. He reflected that measures taken by Ofwat in recent years relating to pay, dividends and aligning cor- porate behaviour with performance "maybe hadn't gone far enough" in the public mind. Despite such regulatory tools being in place, Cox noted a "glaring gap" relating to the difficulty of remov- ing a licence. "I'm not advocating it, but I think this may come if this sector does not respond adequately," Cox said and mused that this may happen by a change in the licence period to, for example, a five-year notice rather than 25-year notice. "It's the one thing that a parliamentarian might decide to do to give the sector a shock, by saying 'you've got five years to clean up the mess and get this sorted, or we put in a shadow operator or auction your licence'." In answer to a question, Cox indicated that if a failing licence holder was given five years to shape up or face the auction of their licence, incentives and recognition of progress would be preserved. Cox acknowledged changing the security from 25 years to five could raise the risk level for investors and might increase the cost of capital. But he argued that in most parts of the world, private operators operate on franchises which can be removed at much less notice and achieve success. "I'm not arguing for this, just making the point that parliamentarians looking toward the 2024 election could see this as the one thing that will make the industry sit up and take notice. It's probably a disaster for everyone, but when Ofwat discovers data that shows six companies may have cases to answer on wastewater treatment dis- charges, you can't not accept there is a legitimacy prob- lem," Cox said. "It could be exactly one of those perverse things that comes about by not meeting the standards society expects – if customers flip from an acceptance of a situation to anger at it, then irrational things happen." He urged companies to win legitimacy by solving the performance problems – partly through investment and partly by "running businesses better" and noted that one-third of sewage overflows arise because of poor maintenance of sewers. During his tenure at Ofwat, Cox pushed for alignment of bonuses and dividends to operational performance to boost transparency. Furthermore, he told companies to be much more active helping consumers engage with consumption, via smart meters; for real-time water quality data to be avail- able for swimmers and waterway users; and continue to drive down leakage. "Embrace customer legitimacy, win the support and you may avoid some politically undesir- able interventions." continued from previous page Conservative MP John Penrose gave the opening keynote address on day one

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UW December HR single pages