Utility Week

UW April HR single pages

Utility Week - authoritative, impartial and essential reading for senior people within utilities, regulators and government

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/1462653

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 43

12 | APRIL 2022 | UTILITY WEEK Water Download report PR24: baby steps or a bold leap forward? As water companies start the long process of drawing up their business plans for the next price control, a new report from Utility Week and PA Consulting explores their hopes and fears for PR24. W ater companies' business plans for the years between 2025 and 2030 cover one of the most critical peri- ods since privatisation. Firms face the twin challenges of reduc- ing their carbon footprint and setting a course to improve resilience against the inev- itable consequences of climate change. They face these huge undertakings amid a backdrop of rising consumer expecta- tions of the sector, both in the level of ser- vice it provides and its guardianship of the environment. Achieving these feats will require ambi- tion and innovative thinking from water companies but will also need a step-change in the regulatory regime to ensure it reflects the evolving demands on the sector. These key themes of the PR24 price con- trol are explored in a major new report from Utility Week, produced in association with PA Consulting. The report is based on interviews with senior figures across the water sector, sev- eral of whom also took part in a roundtable to launch the report and discuss its findings. Attendees at this event shared their con- cern that the next price control will represent an evolution of the current regulatory regime as opposed to the step change needed to make long-term goals achievable. They questioned the rationale behind five-year periods and warned that it was "already too late" for PR24 to represent a rad- ical departure from the current framework. The report shows universal backing for Ofwat's longer-term approach to Asset Man- agement Periods (AMPs), which requires companies to take a 25-year view. However, it also highlights concerns about a lack of flexi- bility in spending programmes as well as cer- tainty of spending guarantees across AMPs. Ofwat said AMPs should be viewed as building blocks within a longer-term plan but sector leaders taking part in the launch event seemed wary about this ambition, with the framework labelled "very restrictive" by one insider. They said: "Ofwat has said there will be long-term thinking but I'm sceptical at this stage to see whether that is a genuine aspi- ration of the regulator or whether that's a moniker while we're still stuck in five-year chunks." Another questioned the legitimacy of thinking in five-year sections when that is far removed from how customers view water and wastewater services and therefore sug- gested the system was "crying out for whole- sale reform". However, they added that they did not expect to see that at PR24, but per- haps at PR29. Others agreed total reform was required but stressed this would take time. "PR19 was a missed opportunity," one insider said. "That's five years gone and PR24 could be the same if the regulatory framework is not ready." Another said: "I worry that the direction of travel for PR24 doesn't address the current issues. PR24 does feel like an evolution of PR19 rather than a significant step change to solve some of the problems we face." The report also gauges views on the thorny issue of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Utility Week - UW April HR single pages