Network

Network April 2019

Issue link: https://fhpublishing.uberflip.com/i/1100701

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 14 of 35

NETWORK / 15 / APRIL 2019 INDUSTRY INSIGHT Reliability is key Christopher Watts, director of regulatory affairs at S&C Electric Company, on why rapid change is affecting electricity distribution networks. T he energy regulator Ofgem excludes incentives for short in- terruptions. However, customer needs have changed considera- bly with digitalisation. Domestic customers are irritated at the loss of internet access and video streaming when routers take several minutes to reset following a short interruption. Retail busi - nesses are upset at the cost and lost sales while equipment reboots. Factories making increasing use of electronic interfaces, smart sensors and alarms are upset at lost production and waste. The share of generation from renewables has increased dramatically with over 50 per cent of renewable generation capacity (and 29 per cent of total capacity) connected to the distribution networks. Short interruptions are less tolerable given volumes of distributed generation (DG). Even an interruption of five seconds will knock generation offline. Some re - cover quickly, and others involve complex, manual startup sequences, so are offline for longer. At scale - such as during storms - this is bad news, as a growing portion of generation isn't available. When broader DERs are considered the impact is greater. They can't provide services to the distribution network or other users when the network is unavailable. Development in flexibility services Ofgem and BEIS' Smart System and Flex- ibility Plan highlights the benefits of a smarter, flexible energy system to be £17-40 billion up to 2050. However, it shouldn't be forgotten that most flexibility resources will be connected to distribution feeders and depend on distribution reliability to provide services. All outages matter. DERs can't provide flexibility services if the network isn't avail- able. Addressing CIs and CMLs It isn't enough to address customer inter- ruptions (Cis) and customer minutes lost (CMLs). There was a 28 per cent improve- ment in CIs and 43 per cent improvement in CMLs over 2010-2016. However, there was a 16 per cent increase in short interruptions, which may be higher given data issues. Strategies used to manage CIs and CMLs are causing short interruptions. Seventy to 80 per cent of faults affecting overhead lines are transient. Replacing fuses on spurs with auto-sectionalisers has improved CIs and CMLs, because you don't have transient faults blowing fuses. However, when using sectionalisers with up-line breakers or reclosers, short interruptions increase sig - nificantly, as this doesn't contain the fault to the spur it occurs on. This worked well previously but isn't well suited to a grid with large proportions of DG and other DERs. A loss of network availability means services can't be provided peer-to-peer or to support the distribution or transmission systems. Different regulatory approaches Incentives on short interruptions have been implemented in Victoria, Australia, Norway, Finland and Italy. Since the Italian energy Addressing CIs and CMLs has caused growing short interruptions.'*Based on Ofgem data excluding SSEN. regulator extended incentives to short inter- ruptions in 2008 the number of short inter- ruptions has fallen by 46 per cent. It's also worth introducing incentives on DG interruptions (DGI) and minutes lost (DGML), covering both short and longer outages. There are devices, such as single phase reclosers, that can accurately measure what's happening to short and sustained interruption performance. Let's take reliability to the next level. Find out more at: www.sandc.com/ReliabilityUK

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Network - Network April 2019